
The Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II changed the legal landscape for freight brokers and shippers overnight. Negligent-hiring claims are now firmly on the table, and your team's fluency in FMCSA carrier safety data is the front line of your defense.
11 chapters | about 7 hours | certificate | taught by a transportation attorney
Broker liability resourcesFor years, freight brokers operated under the assumption that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA) preempted state-law negligent-hiring claims against them. A federal circuit split made the picture murky, with some courts allowing the claims and others tossing them as preempted.
In Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved the split 9–0, holding that the FAAAA's safety exception preserves state-law negligent-hiring claims against brokers. The practical effect: brokers and shippers can now be sued for the carriers they choose. A carrier's public FMCSA safety profile is the evidence.
Why This Matters
A reasonable broker or shipper is expected to understand the carrier's safety record before tendering a load. Personnel who select and monitor carriers need fluency in FMCSA's public data sources to defend their decisions.
Negligent-hiring claims for selecting carriers with poor safety records are no longer preempted for interstate freight.
Shippers who directly tender freight to carriers face parallel exposure under the same negligent-selection theories.
Anyone in the chain of carrier selection, including sales reps, ops coordinators, and compliance analysts, can find their documentation in discovery.
A self-paced video course on Trucksafe Academy designed to give broker and shipper personnel the fluency they need to read, interpret, and document FMCSA carrier safety data in a post-Montgomery world.
$450per seat
Self-paced on Trucksafe Academy. Choose the number of seats at checkout, and volume discounts apply automatically.
| Seats | Discount | Per seat |
|---|---|---|
| 2–5 | 10% off | $405 |
| 6–10 | 15% off | $382.50 |
| 11–20 | 20% off | $360 |
| 21–35 | 25% off | $337.50 |
| 36–50 | 30% off | $315 |
| 51+ | 35% off | $292.50 |
Completion is tracked for each learner, and the certificate is suitable for employee training files.

Owner & President, Trucksafe | Partner, Childress Law
A transportation attorney with deep experience advising the nation's leading motor carriers and representing them before the FMCSA. Brandon has built his career at the intersection of regulatory compliance, safety program design, and litigation, which positions him to teach broker and shipper personnel what FMCSA data means and how courts evaluate carrier-selection decisions.
Background reading, the case itself, and practical guidance for navigating the post-Montgomery environment.

What the decision means for carrier selection, and what the public FMCSA data in front of your team shows.

The unanimous ruling means freight brokers can now be sued for negligent hiring under state law, and a carrier's CSA BASIC scores and safety rating are the evidence.

Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC: the full unanimous opinion by Justice Barrett with concurrence by Justice Kavanaugh.

The public-facing window into FMCSA carrier data. Search by USDOT number, MC number, or legal name.

Operating authority history, BMC-91 insurance filings, BOC-3 process agent records, and lapse history.

Work directly with our team of transportation attorneys to design, audit, or strengthen your carrier-vetting program.
How negligent-hiring claims against brokers typically play out in litigation, and what role carrier-vetting documentation plays in a courtroom.
A negligent-hiring (or negligent-selection) claim alleges that the broker or shipper failed to exercise reasonable care in choosing the motor carrier that ultimately caused harm. The plaintiff argues that a reasonable broker would have seen warning signs in the carrier's public FMCSA profile (elevated OOS rates, prior crashes, a Conditional safety rating, lapsed insurance, an unrated new entrant) and would have declined to use that carrier.
The duty of care is borrowed from common-law principles. The breach is measured against what other, similarly-situated brokers do. The damages flow from the underlying crash.
Every case turns on its facts, and the post-Montgomery standard is still being shaped by juries. A few questions come up again and again: whether the company had a written process and followed it, whether the people choosing carriers understood the public data in front of them, and whether the file shows what was reviewed before the load was tendered. What your program should look like is a question for your leadership and counsel.
The content on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The post-Montgomery standard of care is still being shaped by juries and lower courts. For advice on your specific situation, consult qualified transportation counsel.
Trucksafe's transportation attorneys and safety consultants serve as testifying and consulting experts in broker and shipper liability cases, covering FMCSR applicability, carrier-selection and vetting practices, and what the public FMCSA data showed at the time.
Whether you need to train your team on FMCSA data, audit your existing carrier-vetting program, or design one from scratch, Trucksafe's transportation attorneys can help.